The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in February that patents on Amgen’s Repatha that covered hundreds of distinct antibodies were too broad to be valid, as they wouldn’t allow a skilled artisan to recreate all possible variations of the invention without undue experimentation.
Amgen told the high court in its petition for review that the Federal Circuit’s ruling “defies more than a century” of Supreme Court precedent and its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.