US Chief Justice
“Personally directed hostility is dangerous, and it’s got to stop,” said Roberts in a conversation at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
Roberts didn’t mention President
At a news conference following the ruling, Trump assailed justices who ruled against him as “fools,” “lapdogs,” “unpatriotic,” “disloyal to our Constitution” and “an embarrassment to their families.” He suggested, without offering evidence, that they could have been influenced by foreign entities.
Read More:
Federal judges have
Judges and their families have also received unsolicited pizza deliveries. It is part of a trend of implied threats intended to convey that the unknown sender knows where they live.
Roberts said judicial opinions were fair game for criticism short of personal attacks.
“The problem sometimes is that the criticism can move from the focus on legal analysis to personalities,” he said.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Sara Forden
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.