A federal appeals court grilled a
In a Tuesday hearing, Hanover Insurance Co. argued the policy only covered “extra expenses” resulting directly from damage to “covered equipment"—in this case, hardware affected by a power surge—not “property” damage resulting from the initial damage to the covered equipment.
But a panel of judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit appeared skeptical.
“You’re misreading 5(a),” Judge Richard L. Sullivan ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.