The policy sold by Progressive and its subsidiary contained illegal provisions that rendered the coverage secondary rather than primary, excluded entire categories of damages such as medical expenses, and forced insured parties into a separate occupational accident insurance system, according to a complaint filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
The “bait-and-switch” scheme ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.