The stock represented equity, not assets, and didn’t increase the size of the “equity pie,” Matthew Beato of Wiley Rein LLP, arguing for Midvale, told the Delaware Supreme Court during oral arguments Wednesday.
“There’s nothing that they lost by giving up these shares, all it did was dilute existing stockholders,” Beato said.
Justice Gary F. Traynor asked AMC whether the value of its assets were diminished by the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.