Neither the St. Louis-based insurance broker, A.I.G. Agency Inc., nor the insurance giant was able to show whether the “AIG” mark caused consumer inconvenience and puzzlement, a prerequisite for trademark infringement claims, Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri said Wednesday. The judge denied both parties’ summary judgment motions.
“There is genuine dispute about whether the AIG Mark ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.