Medical payment facilitator Waystar Inc. properly repurchased a former executive’s stock under the terms of her options contracts because the use of the word “and” didn’t create an additional requirement, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled.
A split among federal courts of appeal—now headed for the US Supreme Court’s review—over the meaning of “and” in a criminal statute “illustrates the range of possible interpretations” of that word, Justice Karen L. Valihura wrote Thursday for the state high court. But the criminal case’s outcome won’t determine the result here because the texts at issue are different, she said.
The “call right” provision ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
