A Republican plan to cut $250 billion in Medicaid and other health-care spending hit a procedural roadblock in the Senate Thursday, complicating efforts to pass President
The Senate’s legislative rules-keeper judged a series of key health care provisions in the legislation ineligible for a special procedure Republicans are using to bypass the Senate’s normal process so they can avoid making concessions to Democrats.
Read More:
Senate Republican leaders are working to re-fashion the provisions to comply with the rules and believe they will be able to restore many of the cuts, according to people familiar with the effort. But the rewriting could take time and delay plans to begin votes on the legislation on Friday.
“We’ve got contingency plans. We’ve got a plan B, plan C,” Senate Majority Leader
Senate Parliamentarian
The ruling, announced by Senate Democrats Thursday morning, is likely good news for
Shares of HCA rose 3.8% and Tenet rose as much as 4.9% following the news of the parliamentarian ruling.
Republicans have said previous parliamentarian rulings on food stamps and other provisions have already threatened to strike more than $300 billion in cuts.
White House Press Secretary
“This is part of the inner workings of the United States Senate, but the president is adamant about seeing this bill on his desk here at the White House by Independence Day,” she said.
The ruling could solve one problem for GOP leaders in that it would render moot objections from senators like
Brian Blase, president of the conservative think tank Paragon Health Institute and a former Trump White House official, criticized provider taxes as “corporate welfare,” and said former President
“I trust Senate Republicans will find a path forward to make these provisions that reduce the provider tax scam compliant with their parliamentary rules,” Blase said.
Political Wrangling
The ruling, however, exacerbates Thune and House Speaker
Hardline conservative House members such as
The House version of the provider tax provision, which is less aggressive than the Senate’s draft, would have saved the federal government $89 billion over a decade, according to congressional budget analysts.
Hawley said he talked to Trump and the president agrees that freezing provider taxes, as was done in the House bill, is a better idea than cutting them.
The ruling has already fueled calls from House conservatives for the Senate to overrule the advice of the parliamentarian. Thune has said that he opposes that since allowing non-budgetary matters into the fast-track legislative process would erode the Senate filibuster.
The parliamentarian also rejected attempts to change cost sharing in Obamacare and stop Affordable Care Act plans from covering abortion services.
(Updates with John Thune, Karoline Leavitt remarks beginning in fourth paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Laura Davison, Wendy Benjaminson
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.