The Trump administration announced a crackdown on pharmaceutical advertising on television and social media platforms, potentially disrupting billions of dollars in annual ad spending.
President
The US is the only place, besides New Zealand, where pharma companies can directly advertise to consumers. Limiting pharmaceutical advertisements has been a longtime priority for Health and Human Services Secretary
But even adding stricter requirements to the ads will likely hit both pharmaceutical companies and the media companies that rely heavily on those advertising dollars.
Drug companies spent $10.8 billion in 2024 on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising in total, according to a report from the advertising data firm MediaRadar.
AbbVie couldn’t immediately be reached for comment and Pfizer declined to comment.
Aside from new regulations, the agencies also plan to more strictly enforce existing rules around misleading advertising.
“The FDA is sending approximately 100 enforcement action letters today and thousands of letters warning the industry, including online pharmacies, who have increasingly been promoting drugs with no mention of side effects at all,” FDA Commissioner
Proponents of drug advertising say the ads can prompt patients to talk to their doctors about medical issues, but critics point out that the ads generally feature expensive, brand-name medications.
Bloomberg
Side Effects
A senior administration official confirmed that the new Trump administration regulations may require broadcast ads to be longer to ensure they disclose the full risk profile of medications. Another official clarified that the goal is not to reduce the number of ads, but ensure patients have full information about side effects.
“They’re going to have to report all their side effects,” Kennedy said in an interview with Fox News Tuesday evening. “In some cases that might create an advertisement that’s four minutes long.”
The National Association of Broadcasters didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Before the loosening of advertising regulations by the FDA in 1997, US pharma companies had to list all possible side effects for a medication if they wanted to mention which condition the drug being advertised was intended to treat. Reading out the long lists drove up costs for air time, making the ads less practical.
That FDA change in 1997 allowed ads to disclose fewer side effects and also allowed companies to direct customers to talk to their doctors, call a telephone number or visit a website to get more information on the advertised drugs. In the following years, TV pharma ad spending surged.
Last year, 59% of the pharmaceutical industry’s expenditures were on TV advertising, making pharma the third-highest spending industry, according to MediaRadar.
Social Media
The Trump administration is also planning to ensure drug ads made by influencers and other social media posts abide by the same standards applied to TV, an administration official said.
The FDA released draft guidelines for social media in 2014, which haven’t been updated in the decade since drug ads proliferated.
In 2023, a Bloomberg Law investigation found that the FDA’s prescription drug office had sent just a handful of warning letters to pharmaceutical companies about ad violations or questionable promotional activities on social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. None of the letters available in the database mention TikTok, the social media platform that’s recently exploded with mentions of popular weight-loss medications, including sponsored posts for telehealth companies that sell the drugs. TikTok and other platforms have taken steps to rein in weight-loss related content, though it hasn’t been easy.
Research firm Emarketer projected that the pharmaceutical industry would spend more than $19 billion on online marketing in 2024. The spending was driven in part by ads for weight-loss and diabetes medications.
Telehealth Companies
Administration officials said they’d also be taking a closer look at advertisements from telehealth companies, which operate differently from traditional pharma companies. They declined to mention specific companies, but noted a Super Bowl advertisement from a telehealth company that received criticism from senators.
In February, Republican Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas and Democratic Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois sent a letter to the FDA about telehealth company
Hims couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
Earlier Tuesday, the administration mentioned greater enforcement by HHS, FDA, the
(Adds efforts to reach companies for comment throughout and quotes from Makary in eighth paragraph and Kennedy in twelfth paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Lindsay Blakely
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.