The US Supreme Court upheld the federal regulation of built-at-home “ghost gun” kits, backing a rule put in place during the Biden administration to stem what officials said was a torrent of untraceable weapons.
The 7-2 decision keeps in force a 2022 rule that subjects commercially sold gun kits to the same requirements as fully assembled firearms, requiring serial numbers and background checks. The Trump administration, which took no position in the court case, will now inherit the regulation.
Writing for the court, Justice
Justices
Former President
The rule was challenged by a collection of manufacturers and gun-rights supporters led by Texas resident and former police officer Jennifer VanDerStok. They said the Biden administration was trying to expand the definition of a firearm beyond what Congress intended in the 1968 measure.
“We think it’s sad that our client, a former law enforcement officer, might be considered a criminal because of her hobby of building firearms,” said William Trachman, general counsel of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, which represented the challengers. He called on Attorney General
Asked to comment on the ruling, a Justice Department spokesperson said the department “will continue to support and defend the Second Amendments rights of all Americans.” The case didn’t involve the Constitution’s Second Amendment and focused solely the power given to ATF by Congress.
‘Murder Weapons’
Gun-safety groups hailed the ruling. “Striking down this rule would have meant unleashing untraceable murder weapons back into our communities, undoubtedly spiking violent crime,” said Kris Brown, president of the gun-violence prevention group Brady.
Supporters of the regulation included Everytown for Gun Safety, which is backed by
The law defines a “firearm” to include a weapon that “may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive,” as well as “the frame or receiver of any such weapon.” The frame or receiver is the part of a gun that houses the firing mechanism and other components.
The challengers said the kits don’t come with fully assembled frames or receivers, putting them outside the law’s ambit. A kit might require the removal of plastic tabs and the drilling of holes so that pins can be inserted.
The Biden administration said the challengers were trying to circumvent the decades-old law. During arguments in October, then-Solicitor General
The Supreme Court in 2023
The case bore similarities to the court’s 6-3
The case is Bondi v. VanDerStok, 23-852 .
(Updates with reaction to ruling starting in seventh paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth, Greg Stohr
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.