- Liberal justices say web designer case would allow bias
- Supreme Court considers case pitting gay rights, free speech
US Supreme Court Justice
“How about people who don’t believe in interracial marriage or people who don’t believe disabled people should be married?” Sotomayor asked the designer’s attorney during oral arguments Monday.
The court is considering a case challenging whether a Colorado anti-discrimination law compels or silences free speech by businesses in a way that violates the Constitution. The case was brought by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group, on behalf of Lorie Smith, the owner of 303 Creative LLC.
ADF CEO Kristen Waggoner, who is arguing the case on behalf of Smith, responded to Sotomayor that the Constitution protects the rights of speakers to refuse to promote messages they disapprove of.
She nodded to the court’s 2015 ruling recognizing a right to same-sex marriage, Obergefell v. Hodges. There the court said, “Many who deem same-sex marriage to be wrong reach that conclusion based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises, and neither they nor their beliefs are disparaged here.”
Other members of the court’s liberal wing joined Sotomayor with similar questions about how else businesses would be able to discriminate if the court were to side with Smith. Justice
“My photographer is speaking by being forced to create photos with minority children,” she said in the hypothetical example.
Justice
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Seth Stern
© 2022 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.

