A dispute over a Carbondale, Ill., law that limits protests near abortion clinics presents the US Supreme Court with a perfect vehicle to overturn a 2000 top court decision that’s “patently incompatible” with the First Amendment, an anti-abortion group says.
Carbondale’s disorderly conduct ordinance—upheld by the lower courts in light of Hill v. Colorado—is a carbon copy of the “bubble,” or “buffer,” zone law approved by the high court in that 24-year-old ruling, Coalition Life told the justices on Tuesday. Hill was wrongly decided and has been “all but interred” by subsequent First Amendment decisions, it said in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.