A North Carolina plastic surgeon held onto a win in a case involving chest scarring following a liposuction procedure, because the patient’s sole expert witness said he could only speculate that the physician’s actions caused the injury, a state appeals court said.
Summary judgment for Saira Saini in this medical malpractice case was proper because Thomas McDonald didn’t present any evidence linking the burn scars on his chest to the physician’s alleged negligence, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said Tuesday.
McDonald went to Saini over concerns about his chest’s appearance. She assessed him to be a good candidate for ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.