The maker of Nexium and several potential generic competitors that allegedly agreed to stay out of the market must defend Sherman Act claims by both direct purchasers and end-payors of the drug, according to a Sept. 11 decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which applied a rule of reason approach as dictated by the Supreme Court’s Actavis decision (In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation, D. Mass., 1:12-md-02409-WGY, 9/11/13).
Challenged Conduct.
Two groups consisting of wholesale drug distributors (direct purchasers) and health and welfare benefit funds (end-payors) brought suit against
- AstraZeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.