The FDA’s decision to regulate laboratory-developed tests triggers the major questions doctrine because it has vast economic and political significance, a group representing molecular pathologists told a federal court.
The Food and Drug Administration’s final rule giving it explicit power to oversee certain medical tests that come from a single laboratory, known as laboratory-developed tests (LDTs), is a “quintessential” major questions case, the Association for Molecular Pathology and pathologist Michael Laposata wrote in a motion for summary judgment before the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
At issue before the court is whether the FDA acted arbitrarily ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.