- Lower court sided with Meta’s removal of anti-vaccine posts
- Rejection to review deals blow to Children’s Health Defense
The US Supreme Court won’t weigh in on a censorship case brought by a Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-founded anti-vaccine group that challenged
The Justices denied Monday to review a case filed by the Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy before he became US health secretary for the Trump administration, that argued its First Amendment rights were violated when Facebook restricted the group’s posts.
The order comes after the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in August 2024 that Meta as a private business can censor posts on its platform, and only in “exceptional circumstances” can it be treated as a state actor subject to constitutional restrictions.
The Children’s Health Defense failed to adequately allege that Meta’s content moderation policies for vaccine misinformation were based on an agreement between the platform and the government, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion said.
The Children’s Health Defense did not immediately respond to request for comment.
The case is Children’s Health Defense v. Meta Platforms Inc., U.S., No. 24-732, cert denied 6/30/25.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.