A Mississippi doctor is entitled to a new trial in a medical malpractice case because the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury about his theory of the case—that a nurse’s negligence, not his actions, caused his patient’s injuries—the state’s top court said.
Orhan Ilercil had a right to have his intervening/superseding cause defense properly presented to the jury, the Mississippi Supreme Court said.
Ilercil performed cervical spine surgery on James Williams. He had Williams taken to the intensive case unit and left instructions that he was to be called if Williams exhibited shortness of breath, difficulty swallowing, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.