The settlement resolves complaints brought by
“The dollar amount to be received by the state is the pro-rated share it would have received under the broader agreement in principle, which will be deducted from the all-in settlement amount,” J&J said in the statement. The company’s Janssen unit stopped making opioid painkillers last year. J&J denied any wrongdoing.
Thousands of lawsuits have been filed by states, cities and counties against opioid makers, drug distributors and pharmacy chains over their roles in fueling the U.S. opioid epidemic, which has claimed the lives of almost 500,000 Americans over the last 20 years. Most of those claims are pending.
James’ office said in a separate statement the J&J settlement would provide $230 million to New York municipalities. That figure didn’t include legal fees and costs that J&J factored into its final tally, said Fabian Levy, a spokesman for James.
“While no amount of money will ever compensate for the thousands who lost their lives or became addicted to opioids across our state or provide solace to the countless families torn apart by this crisis, these funds will be used to prevent any future devastation,” James said in the release.
Pending Claims
More than half a dozen opioid manufacturers, including
McKesson and the two other distributors have proposed to pay
The J&J deal doesn’t affect a current California non-jury trial in which the company is among a group of opioid makers accused of illegally marketing opioids. The trial is expected to last at least another month.
Under the terms of J&J’s New York deal, the drugmaker will hand over $30 million as a first payment tied to the settlement once New York Governor
The legislation was prompted by outrage over New York state officials’ decision earlier this year to divert some of a $32 million settlement reached with consulting firm
Once the lockbox is in place, “New York would be eligible to receive more than half of total payments, or more than $130 million, as soon as February 2022,” James said in a statement.
Meanwhile,
The case is In Re Opioid Litigation, Index no. 40000/2017, Supreme Court of New York, Suffolk County.
(Updates with details on settlement)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.