Illinois can’t require medical professionals seeking to take advantage of a state conscience law’s liability shield to discuss the risks and benefits of an abortion with their patients, a federal court said.
The compelled discussion provision violates the First Amendment’s free-speech clause and thus is unconstitutional, the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said April 4. The state, however, can require professionals to refer, transfer, or provide written information about abortion providers to patients who request it because that provision doesn’t compel speech, Judge
Johnston granted the anti-abortion group National Institute of Family ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.