At issue is a “reverse payment agreement” in which GSK “paid” Teva to stay out of the market by promising not to launch its own authorized generic version. But for the agreement, Teva would have launched its generic sooner, and GSK would have started selling its authorized generic the same day Teva entered the market, the purchasers alleged.
The six-month delay drove up prices for both ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.