EEOC, Nestlé Battle Over Subpoena Authority Of Agency Under GINA’s Text and Regulations

Feb. 2, 2012, 5:00 AM UTC

A private physician who occasionally performs work-related medical exams of a company’s employees and job applicants at the company’s request is not an “employer” for purposes of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act’s ban on the collection of a worker’s genetic information, two business groups argued Jan. 23 in an amicus brief (EEOC v. Nestlé Prepared Foods).

The Equal Employment Advisory Council and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed the brief in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky in a subpoena enforcement case brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Nestlé Prepared Foods.

They ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.