The manufacturer of branded Adderall XR® did not monopolize the market by allegedly undersupplying two generic competitors pursuant to a patent settlement agreement among the three companies, according to a June 9 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (In re Adderall XR Antitrust Litigation, 2014 BL 158611, 2d Cir., 13-1232, 6/9/14; Louisiana Wholesale Co. v. Shire LLC, 2014 BL 158611, 2d Cir., 13-1232, 6/9/14).
Judge Robert D. Sack concluded that, despite Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. Inc.'s assertions, Shire LLC and Shire U.S. Inc. did not violate federal antitrust law by breaching the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.