An anti-abortion protester wasn’t entitled to judgment before trial on whether Asheville, N.C.'s ordinance banning amplified speech outside of medical centers violated his free-speech rights.
Zachary Hebb shouldn’t have won summary judgment on his challenge to a city law that allegedly prevented him from engaging in his preferred form of protest outside a Planned Parenthood clinic, a split US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit said Wednesday. The city’s evidence raised genuine issues of material fact as to whether the ordinance was content-neutral, narrowly tailored, and provided ample alternative channels of communication, the majority said.
Several US cities and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.