The American Medical Association won’t have to disclose the names of its peer reviewers, including a government official, that were involved in a 2020 decision to soften an article in its medical journal linking
An Illinois appellate court held Friday that the information is protected by state reporter-protection laws and not essential to the public interests.
The Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, was scheduled to publish an article asserting Zantac, a blockbuster drug for Glaxo, was a carcinogen. The day before the manuscript was scheduled to be published, the AMA ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.