A Texas pharmacist failed to adequately allege that
Whisteblower Bridgette Jacobs didn’t show that the 10 alleged examples of fraudulent billing in her complaint amounted to anything more than innocent mistakes or negligence, a panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Wednesday in a nonprecedential opinion.
Jacobs characterized Walgreens’s actions as mistakes in her complaint, the court said.
After dismissing her original complaint, the district court gave Jacobs a chance to address the pleading ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.