Hospice services provider Care Alternatives told the U.S. Supreme Court that an appeals court erroneously revived a False Claims Act suit alleging that the company provided hospice care to patients who lacked Medicare eligibility.
The ruling created a circuit split that needs resolution, Care Alternatives said in a petition for writ of certiorari docketed Sept. 16.
The Supreme Court should reject the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s FCA interpretation and find that claims for payment can’t be false under the FCA if there is a reasonable disagreement among physicians as to whether a patient was terminally ill ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.