SOS’s multiple challenges to the award decision fell short, including its argument that the Army erred by not giving its program management plan a higher score, the Government Accountability Office said.
SOS said that it should have received “significant strengths” from Army evaluators, as opposed to “strengths,” because its proposed personnel had experiences, qualifications, and certifications that justified the highest possible rating ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.