SOS’s multiple challenges to the award decision fell short, including its argument that the Army erred by not giving its program management plan a higher score, the Government Accountability Office said.
SOS said that it should have received “significant strengths” from Army evaluators, as opposed to “strengths,” because its proposed personnel had experiences, qualifications, and certifications that justified the highest possible rating ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.