The US Supreme Court during oral arguments Tuesday struggled to get a clearer understanding of whether a proper interpretation of the False Claims Act requires reviving drug price fraud claims against
But some justices indicated that the FCA requires consideration of a defendant’s subjective intent, which could lead to reinstating the suits.
Whistleblowers in two consolidated cases say the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit relied on an improper interpretation of the FCA’s scienter standard to reject their claims against the companies. The appeals court said that the companies didn’t knowingly submit false ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.