Whistleblower and shipping company Sedona Partners LLC won another opportunity to allege that rival companies engaged in a fraudulent scheme to secure government contracts from the US General Services Administration.
A federal district court erred in concluding that it must dismiss the suit for lack of particularity solely because Sedona relied on evidence obtained in discovery, Judge
Federal rule of civil procedure 9(b), which requires plaintiffs to plead fraud with adequate detail, doesn’t bar plaintiffs from raising allegations based on information from discovery, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.