Four whistleblowers told a federal court that it should reject
Fluor has no “substantial need” for these documents, despite its argument that the statements could show that the whistleblowers’ complaint relied on privileged information that was stolen by two former employees, the whistleblowers told the US District Court for the District of South Carolina in a May 25 filing.
The whistleblowers allege that Fluor defrauded the US Army ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.