Phillip M. Adams’ proposed amended complaint failed to allege any statements made by Dell, and therefore his allegations don’t satisfy pleading requirements under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Judge Thomas F. Hogan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said Tuesday.
The proposed amended complaint didn’t correct flaws related to pleading materiality or scienter, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.