Protester Tista Science & Technology Corp. didn’t demonstrate that a VA contracting officer relied on “spurious” factual findings before determining that Booz Allen Hamilton wouldn’t have an impaired objectivity conflict if it won the award, Chief Judge Matthew H. Solomson said. The US Court of Federal Claims released the opinion Friday.
An impaired objectivity conflict arises when a contractor under one contract has the chance ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.