Protester Tista Science & Technology Corp. didn’t demonstrate that a VA contracting officer relied on “spurious” factual findings before determining that Booz Allen Hamilton wouldn’t have an impaired objectivity conflict if it won the award, Chief Judge Matthew H. Solomson said. The US Court of Federal Claims released the opinion Friday.
An impaired objectivity conflict arises when a contractor under one contract has the chance ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.