Whistleblower Carl Krawitt couldn’t show that Apple improperly relied on B-1 visas to bring the trainers into the country instead of the more expensive and numerically capped H1-B visas, nor could he show that Apple willfully ignored immigration rules, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said.
There is “ambiguity in the allowable uses of B-1 visas arising out of differences in interpretation of relevant immigration laws ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.