An investor sued WeWork Inc. in Delaware, claiming the company’s board gave itself an illegally broad liability shield when it recently adopted measures aimed at blocking a hostile takeover.
The lawsuit, targeting the coworking space company and its 10-member board, challenges a “stockholder rights plan” that took effect April 7, with a one-year sunset clause. WeWork has said the purpose of the so-called poison pill was to protect valuable tax assets—net operating loss carryforwards—from structural threats posed by a potential ownership change.
The company declined to comment on the allegations through a spokesperson.
The case is the latest in Delaware’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.