Ohio’s Right-to-Lawyer Ruled Narrower Than Sixth Amendment’s

April 30, 2026, 3:03 PM UTC

A criminal defendant’s right to an attorney as laid out in the Ohio Constitution is narrower than that afforded by the US Constitution’s Sixth Amendment, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The court, in ordering reversed a trial judge’s order that suppressed statements made by a suspect during an interrogation prior to his indictment and arraignment, said the state constitution’s right-to-counsel clause deals with “any trial” and “any court.” Justice R. Patrick DeWine (R) wrote, adding that this includes preparation for court proceedings but not out-of-court police activity.

“We don’t ordinarily understand a preindictment police interrogation—conducted in a police ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.