“Match.com had the ability to detect potentially fraudulent users and block their communications,” and “it did, but only for a fee,” the 167-page lawsuit says. “For nonsubscribers, on the other hand, Match.com used the fraudulent users to entice membership subscriptions.”
A news report, meanwhile, found that Match screens “its flagship dating site” for “sexual ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.