A Delaware judge ruled against the pharmaceutical giant eight months after a trial of claims that it engaged in wide-ranging breaches of its agreement with former Auris shareholders by failing to pursue regulatory approvals for two projects with blockbuster potential, the iPlatform and the Monarch.
More than $2 billion in additional payments hinged on the approvals. The allegations echoed a recurring theme in Delaware’s Chancery Court, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.