J&J Worldwide Vice President of Litigation Erik Haas said that the company disagrees with the court’s decision and will seek review from the full court.
The plaintiffs were investors who bought J&J stock from February 2013 to December 2018. During that time, J&J concealed that the talc products contained asbestos, lead plaintiff San Diego County Employees Retirement Association said.
The district court correctly concluded that ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.