Gruenberg, 71, faced mounting pressure following a scathing report that detailed allegations of harassment and discrimination at the bank regulator during his tenure. Those findings earlier this month by law firm
“In light of recent events, I am prepared to step down from my responsibilities once a successor is confirmed,” Gruenberg said in a statement.
The
After surviving two bruising days of congressional hearings last week, the political pressure on Gruenberg surged Monday when a key Democrat called on President
Since the law firm’s report was released on May 7, Gruenberg had vowed to fix the agency’s problems and apologized repeatedly to employees. Last week, he told lawmakers, including Brown, that he was the correct person to lead a cultural overhaul at the agency.
The probe, which cited allegations over decades and under multiple agency leaders, didn’t find that Gruenberg himself had engaged in harassment or discrimination, but cited examples of the FDIC chief losing his temper with staff and questioned whether he was the best person to drive change.
Regulatory Agenda
After the announcement, House Majority Whip
Beyond the FDIC, Gruenberg’s eventual exit could have significant ramifications for the Biden administration’s regulatory agenda and the financial industry.
If Gruenberg were to ever leave without a replacement being confirmed, the FDIC would be split evenly 2-2 between Democrats and Republicans. In that instance,
The FDIC, the
Read More:
It’s unclear how quickly the White House can nominate and win Senate approval of a permanent chair, but delays in confirming presidential nominees are common during election years.
WATCH: Republican Representative Emmer shares his thoughts on FDIC Chair Gruenberg saying he will step down. Source: Bloomberg
Intense Pressure
Sam Michel, deputy press secretary at the White House said in a statement that Biden would “soon put forward a new nominee for FDIC chair who is committed to those values and to protecting consumers and ensuring the stability of our financial system, and we expect the Senate to confirm the nominee quickly.”
Gruenberg has been serving in his second stint as chairman and has been an FDIC board member since 2005. In addition to twice serving as FDIC chairman, he has led the agency in an acting capacity. Before joining the regulator, Gruenberg, who was trained as a lawyer, worked for almost two decades as a Senate staffer.
Some of the allegations of misconduct in the law firm’s report were fairly recent. Others go back decades — as early as the 1980s — under more than one chair. Some Democrats had argued that former leaders of the agency, including Republican-appointed chair, should shoulder some of the blame and that Gruenberg could fix the agency’s problems.
However, by Monday the political pressure had grown too intense. In a sign of things to come,
“This controversy is hurting him and the agency,” she said.
(Updates with White House comment in fourth and 13th paragraphs.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Stephanie Stoughton
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.