Corporate boards looking to slow the momentum of activist investors are triggering a series of legal showdowns over claims they’re wielding a new strategy for rigging proxy contexts.
Confronted by a tide of dissidents, sitting directors are increasingly deploying strict reporting requirements and deadlines onerous enough to “choke a horse,” in the words of one recent lawsuit, against those who nominate rivals. The tactic has led to a wave of court cases asking how far boards can push those advance-notice bylaws to keep activist nominees off shareholder ballots, including suits targeting
“They’re being weaponized ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.