The US Supreme Court declined Monday to consider whether the government’s orders to a California water district to divert less water violates the takings clause under the Constitution.
United Water Conservation District’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied, sealing review of a federal appeals court ruling that held water level requirements for the Santa Clara River were “nonpossessory government activity.”
The case centers on a National Marine Fisheries Service letter instructing the water district to use almost 50,000 acre-feet of water for aquifer restoration and groundwater supply after takings of the endangered steelhead trout were reported from United’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.