Federal judges hear virtual oral arguments today in a dispute between the National Wildlife Federation and pipeline safety regulators that could require the government to more closely study oil spill response plans for projects.
- The case centers on the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s oil spill study for Enbridge Inc.'s Line 5, which crosses Michigan’s Straits of Mackinac.
- A lower court last year agreed with environmentalists that the agency should have done a more extensive analysis before approving a spill response plan for the oil pipeline. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reviewing that decision. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
