Name, Logo Enough Evidence in California Asbestos Case (1)

May 21, 2020, 7:46 PM UTCUpdated: May 21, 2020, 8:21 PM UTC

A logo and company name on an invoice is sufficient circumstantial evidence from a witness about the source of asbestos-containing pipes, a unanimous California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Justices in a 7-0 opinion reversed a state appellate court and reinstated a $1.6 million jury award against Keenan Properties Inc.

Jurors found for now-deceased pipe layer Frank Hart, who alleged in a suit filed with his wife that he developed mesothelioma from workplace exposure to asbestos-containing cement pipes that Keenan delivered to his Humboldt County, Calif., job site in 1976-77.

The jury based its finding on a foreman who testified he ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.