Michigan Supreme Court justices questioned how much deference they should give a state regulator’s decision to impose a “buy local” energy rule, in a clash that could see higher energy costs for large consumers like hospitals and schools.
The Nov. 7 arguments addressed whether the Michigan Public Service Commission has the right to impose a “local clearing requirement” that would force energy suppliers to meet at least some of their needs with in-state power generators like Consumers Energy Co. and DTE Energy Co.
The Michigan Public Service Commission contends it can impose a buy-local percentage on so-called alternative energy suppliers, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.