The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) adequately considered the emissions impacts and the economic need when it approved a
The court rejected arguments from Food & Water Watch, an environmental group, that the commission impermissibly refused to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from upstream drilling for the extra gas, to quantify ozone emissions from its downstream burning, and to determine whether emissions are significant or insignificant.
The group had also argued FERC failed to consider New York state and New York City laws mandating reductions in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.