Parties challenging the EPA’s rule designating two PFAS and related chemicals to be hazardous Superfund substances have a greater chance to make their case following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that weakened agencies’ authority to interpret ambiguous statutory terms, attorneys say.
The attorneys, including a former Environmental Protection Agency official, said during an American Law Institute webinar Thursday that the high court ruling may impact recent litigation and regulatory developments affecting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and federal waste laws and regulations. The Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision helped broaden regulatory challengers’ opportunities to fight federal agencies’ rules and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
