The complaint against Wesco, which says the company’s retirement plan fees were several times higher than those of similar plans, includes allegations that Wesco failed to negotiate for lower fees and stuck with an asset-based fee structure that allowed costs to rise without a corresponding increase in services.
These allegations are more specific and provide more context than those found viable in the Third Circuit’s 2019 decision in Sweda v. University of Pennsylvania ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
