Voya Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries convinced a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit by a 401(k) investor who says the company overcharged for investment advice provided by robo-adviser Financial Engines Advisors LLC (Patrico v. Voya Fin., Inc., 2017 BL 212065, S.D.N.Y., No. 1:16-cv-07070-LGS, 6/20/17).
The investor, a participant in Nestle USA Inc.'s 401(k) plan who filed a proposed class action, can’t use the Employee Retirement Income Security Act to challenge Voya’s fees, a federal judge ruled June 20. That’s because Voya wasn’t acting as an ERISA fiduciary when it negotiated the fees for Financial Engines’ advisory ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
