The 2014 pension law that authorized the benefit cuts resulted in a government taking of valuable property in which the retirees had an enforceable, vested interest, they said in a brief filed Monday in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. According to the retirees, the law qualifies as a “per se” unconstitutional taking of property.
The appeal challenges a decision holding ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
