An 8,200-person class of participants in
The participants objected to the court’s treatment of a “hardwiring provision” in the T. Rowe Price plan, which memorializes the company’s commitment to offering T. Rowe Price funds into the plan document itself. The court implicitly determined that this provision is legally valid, when it’s actually an illegal “anti-exculpation provision” that attempts to relieve plan fiduciaries from ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
